Kings Cross
railway station is located in central London and is a major terminal that
opened in 1852. Today it’s renovation that has taken five years and cost them
500 pounds, that consists of absolute beautiful architecture throughout the new
departures area, is nearly done. Network Rail has added this outstanding roof
made of white steel, while having restored and persevered the Victorian
facades. The structure spans 150m without a visible bolt throughout the whole
structure. This roof has no supporting structures allowing moment under the
roof to be free and flowing for the 47 million passengers that pass through the
terminal each year. They have also thought about the passengers by adding a
second floor where you are able to relax in cafes and shops. The architects
Hiro Aso who partnered in the project with John McAslan submitted their winning
design is the late 1990’s. Hiro Aso shared "It leaps, it's glorious, organic - a very bold
expression of the overlay of new and old. We could have been a bit more
apologetic, or subordinate, but this is an absolutely amazing structure." The
five-year project has allowed them to build this structure without canceling
one train to produce this masterpiece.
This article really stood out to me
because of my want to become a future architect. The design of the new roof, at
this historic train station is something abnormal that is easily enjoyed. The
architects thought about the movement of the mass amount of people that come
through the station as well as giving them a place to relax and wait. The idea
of a roof the supports it self over a 150m span and look magnificent comes
through experience. Another thing that really stood out to me in this article
is the ability to mix something so modern, with something old and not make a
mess of it. This is the type of building/structure that I would like to be the
architect of one day.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2012/mar/14/five-year-redevelopment-kings-cross-station
Word Count: 329
Word Count: 329
This is done correctly. The only thing you are missing is to give the article title, author, source, date and have that at the top.
ReplyDeleteAdding the picture was a great idea as I have a real feel for what you talk about in this post.